The following is a short excerpt from “Weaponized Sex: Feminism’s Assault on Women.”
I hope you enjoy.
Traditions
So what did good men do in order to stop their loved ones being exploited? Well, through trial and error they created a traditional cultural system to protect women.
All traditions stem from a root cause – usually a problem. This problem is solved, leading to positive outcomes. Without a central bureaucratic body to enforce laws, tradition emerges. Essentially, traditions are solutions to issues humanity has already faced.
And Patriarchal norms are the solution to the issue of predatory men taking advantage of women.
So let’s briefly summarise what these Patriarchal norms are. Firstly, it mandates men leading and women submitting. Unpalatable in modernity, we will explain why this is essential. The Patriarchy is men taking responsibility for everything in relationships and culture – both good and bad – and being the prime force working in public life. Men must be the breadwinner and provider, leading his family into the future. Patriarchal norms place family at the centre with a man’s focus being protecting his wife and children, in order to guide them into a successful future. It is also the importance of men leading men and being premised in a hierarchical meritocracy. It is a culture which is forward thinking, protective and valiant; one which wishes to grow its community and let the strongest take care of the weakest.
Feminism’s ‘Success’
One of Feminism’s greatest successes was convincing women that men are their oppressors, not their protectors. This is a lie, but like all the most effective lies, it is based in some truth. For example, Feminists point to male abuses: rape, domestic assault and controlling natures – all of which are real, and the former two are personal tragedies. But what they do not account for is that the controlling nature of patriarchal men exists so as to prevent the two prior injustices.
The truth of all this is women still find ‘Benevolent Sexists’ attractive (REF 10). I would argue this is grounded in an in-built biological understanding of sexual dimorphism, and the affectations it mandates. Deep down, women know they need a man to protect them, despite on occasion rolling their eyes at it. Women who maintain traditional gender-balanced relationships may find it frustrating at times, but those who have been resistant to Feminist indoctrination balance this with understanding the need for their man to behave this way.
Biological Imperatives
Benevolent Sexism – further termed Virtuous Masculinity – is particularly important to bear in mind when discussing father-figures.
Traditionally, male members of the family jealously protected their offspring, particularly their daughters. This emerges from the understanding of women’s sexuality and sexual dimorphism. As I have already lain out, we can see that women are far more likely to suffer sexual assault than men. Fathers know this, so set about trying to protect their daughters from it – particularly as younger women are more naïve and less likely to fully comprehend the dangers associated with cunning men. Indeed, all male figures within the family would prevent these abuses: fathers, brothers and uncles.
This is why women without strong father figures when growing up struggle to maintain relationships as they get older. They are both more likely to suffer from the problems occurring as a result of wanton sexual congress at a young age, but also have not experienced male protection previously. As a result, they do not understand that limitations are placed for their protection. Why would they? They have never felt the warmth of Patriarchal love.
And this does not even take into account the trauma which results from women engaging in sexual congress before they are ready, something the Virtuous Masculinity of Patriarchal fathers prevents.
So let’s examine the deeply entrenched reasons for the necessity of Virtuous Masculinity and why, even today, women still find these ‘sexists’ so bloody attractive.
Child-Bearing
Women are child bearers. They are the ones who get pregnant and eventually give birth; even Feminists cannot deny this – although they have attempted to engineer a reality where it does not exist; test-tube babies for Radical Feminist Lesbian Separatist Colonies being merely the most extreme example. And no, I’m not making this up (REF 11).
As a result of biology, there can be no doubt about the maternity of children. However, men have NO certainty that they are the paternal figure, except on one condition: the mother of their child was a virgin, and chaste – except to him.
Men intrinsically understand this, thus the historical cultural weight attached to marrying virgins. And this continues: if a man takes his partner’s virginity today, it is still a source of pride. In the past, there was so much weight given to this, in fact, that it was implicitly understood that a wedding would be “White.” And it appears that Patriarchal traditions worked.
Marriage stability demonstrates this. Marriages which are entered into as virgins are more secure than relationships where the woman had previous sexual partners (REF 12). This is steeped in the sexual dimorphism of men and women and is written into our biology.
Based on traditional theories of pregnancy, this makes sense. Heterodox thinking about the matter is that a man has sex with a woman and his sperm penetrates her egg, leading him to be the sole father of her child. It is considered that if more than one sperm penetrates mammal eggs, Polyspermy, this is dangerous to the offspring (REF 13). As a result, if he is the only person having sex with a woman at that time, the child will be his.
However, there is some new evidence – and old theories – which contest this, and further highlight the need for virgin marriages. This is conceptual, but something that I would like to touch upon – even if briefly.
Conceptual
This theory is called ‘Telegony’ (REF 14). Telegony is the idea that previous sexual partners can ‘share’ paternity with a woman for her child. That is, some amount of DNA from semen lives on in the woman and affects the genetic capabilities of children she bears. The theory dates back to Aristotle and is a common motif within Greek mythology.
The modern evidence for this appears to be lacking, but there has been a recent study of fruit flies (REF 15) which appears to reignite it as a possible theory. In this study, the fruit flies that mated with a large male would then, after mating with a smaller male later still give birth to larger offspring. This is only one study of an animal which is biologically disparate from humans but raises an interesting possibility.
It is worth stating that I am not a scientist, so you can take this with a pinch of salt. However, I do believe we should entertain possibilities when the reality is, we can never TRULY know. Again, this is a folly of scientism; that scientific truths are irredeemably certain, and unerring – that they never change. Realistically, scientific truths are incredibly unstable and constantly updated.
So, let’s entertain this theory. What possible influence could it have?
Well, it hints at promiscuous behaviour, especially with ‘inferior’, or beta males, subsequently negatively affecting future offspring. This would mean men would have to jealously guard the chastity of their women, prior to conception of children even, as previous sexual partners may affect the passing on of his genetic wealth to his children.
As a result, before marriage, fathers would have to protect their daughters from unworthy men until they found a man respectable enough to give her children. This would make the father’s genetic line stronger, providing him a biological cause to protect her from degeneracy and solidifying the need for women to be virgins when they got married.
If this occurred, her husband would know it is solely his DNA living on in their child, psychologically bonding them and making him feel comfortable and secure in their relationship. This biologically rooted feeling may not be understood by modern men – but it exists.
However, even within a traditional model of pregnancy – that previous sexual partners do not affect the DNA of children – paternal protection of chastity is still important. As the habits formed as a teenager and in early adulthood extend throughout our lives, these years are essential to forming good life skills. Whilst this is not deterministic – I am an example of that – probabilistically it is true.
So, women who sleep around a lot when they are younger – before committing to a man – are less trusted by their partner, for if they did it once, they can do it again. Trust is essential to a relationship lasting as a man cannot ever truly know if his child is his. Thus, if he is not sure whether his woman is chaste, it will destabilize their relationship.
And this is born out in the statistics. Women who have more sexual partners prior to marriage are more likely to divorce (REF 12).
If you found this short extract enjoyable, consider purchase of “Weaponized Sex: Feminism’s Assault on Women.”
This is just a tiny section of what is contained. Believe me, you will be enlightened.
Thanks for reading.
